posted by Jeff Buchbinder | Chief Equity Strategist
With additional content provided by John Lohse, Sr. Analyst, Research.
We recognize the presidential election is still a way off, but it’s not too early to draw some policy contrasts between the candidates. Though a sitting and former President facing off limits the amount of potential policy uncertainty investors must consider, there is no doubt the two candidates offer two distinct policy approaches in several key areas.
Here are some of the more divergent potential, economic and market positions to think about.
Trade
De-globalization is happening no matter who occupies the White House in 2025, but it could happen faster under Trump. More tariffs mean more supply chain disruption, which could be inflationary as it forces movement in production. From an investment perspective, that means markets in China and Mexico may perform relatively better under a second Biden term rather than the Trump Administration. U.S. multinationals may face increased challenges doing business overseas under a Trump Administration. That means more domestic-focused U.S. companies could benefit, such as small caps, real estate, or even regional banks.
Geopolitics
China bashing has bipartisan support, but beyond China, Trump may give Israel more space to finish off its war against Hamas, though we hesitate to predict a calmer Middle East given history. Trump will likely create some angst for Europe and Japan by being tough on trade, so those markets could fare better under President Biden.
Immigration
Trump’s tough border policies may restrict the pace of immigrant entry into the labor force, which could be inflationary. Labor shortages could impair growth some, though the impact would likely be limited based on probable scenarios for the border, immigration, and deportation of undocumented immigrants.
Taxes
The Trump tax cuts expire in 2025 and will be a big campaign issue this fall. Although election odds are tight based on the latest numbers from the betting markets, it is possible that some of the stock market’s strength reflects some pricing-in of tax cut extensions. The tax “cliff” is massive at $3 trillion, which underscores the importance of the issue.
In terms of market performance, companies paying the highest tax rates may get a boost under Trump. Consumer spending may also get a boost under Trump, who is likely to advocate for lower tax rates all the way up and down the income spectrum (though those cuts will be very difficult to pay for).
President Biden seeks to preserve cuts for those earning $400 thousand in annual income and below, making the cuts easier to pay for. If Trump wins in November, it is possible for him to try to use tariffs to pay for as much in tax cuts as possible.
Among the taxes set to increase: Individual rates, pass-through rates, health insurance surcharges, global minimum tax, inflation reduction act taxes, and housing taxes. Taxing gains on cryptocurrencies is also on the table.
Deficit Spending
The debt ceiling needs to be raised in mid-2025, creating a catalyst for the U.S. debt and deficit. Markets seem to think Trump cares less about the deficit and may put more upward pressure on interest rates than Biden does. Trump’s focus on bringing as much manufacturing back to the U.S. as possible, coupled with the potential for larger deficits, suggests higher interest rates (and some jawboning of the Fed) under Trump and possibly more inflation over time.
Regulatory Policy
Less regulation, a hallmark of Trump’s policies, means that financial services and energy – particularly liquid natural gas (LNG) exports – are likely winners under Trump. Light-touch regulation under Trump could also help the buildout of artificial intelligence (AI), at least incrementally. Getting drug costs down has bipartisan support, so we do not expect much policy contrast from the candidates during the campaign.
The Stock Market as a Predictor
It’s interesting every four years to analyze the relationship between the stock market and the election. We’ll save the evaluation of “Trump stocks” vs. “Biden stocks” for another day, but here we focus on the widely followed three-month indicator. Simply put, over many decades, stock performance from August through October during presidential election years has been shown to be well correlated with election outcomes. Specifically, this indicator has accurately predicted the last 10 presidential winners and 12 of the past 13.
Much more to come from LPL Research on the election as November approaches, but there are some interesting nuggets to whet your appetite. We won’t make any predictions, nor will we make any investment recommendations based on either candidate’s prospects. However, we will point out that the communication services sector, with its heavy traditional and digital media components, looks like a winner right now regardless of who wins in November.
Stock Market Performance Preceding Presidential Election Has Been Predictive of Election Outcomes
Source: LPL Research, Bloomberg 05/21/24
Disclosures: All indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The modern design of the S&P 500 stock index was first launched in 1957. Performance back to 1950 incorporates the performance of predecessor index, the S&P 90.
Much more to come from LPL Research on the election as November approaches, but there are some interesting nuggets to whet your appetite. We won’t make any predictions, nor will we make any investment recommendations based on either candidate’s prospects. However, we will point out that the communication services sector, with its heavy traditional and digital media components, looks like a winner right now regardless of who wins in November.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.
Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.
Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.
This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.
Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.
Asset Class Disclosures –
International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.
Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.
Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.
Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.
Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.
Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.
High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.
Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.
The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor's holdings.
Securities and advisory services offered through LPL Financial, a registered investment advisor and broker-dealer. Member FINRA/SIPC.
Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value
For Public Use – Tracking: #581821
Jeff Buchbinder, CFA, provides the top-down view of the stock market for LPL Financial Research. He has over 25 years of experience in equities.
Original Post: https://www.lpl.com/research/blog/key-market-themes-during-election-periods.html